Nilay Patel, on Brian X. Chen’s iPhone 13 review for
Pravda The New York Times:
The NYT does not believe regular people stand to benefit from
better iPhone photos in the dark. I live for this review from
another planet every year.
I thought this was a really strange passage too. Quoting from
So in summary, the iPhone 13 cameras are slightly better than
those of last year’s iPhones. Even compared with iPhones from
three years ago, the cameras are much better only if you care
about taking nice photos in the dark.
Just how important is night photography? I posed the question to
Jim Wilson, a longtime staff photographer for The New York Times,
as he was taking pictures of the new iPhones for this review. He
said it would be a crucial feature for people like him, but not as
important for casual shooters.
Photos taken with the iPhone 11 and 11 Pro looked crisp and clear,
and their colors were accurate. But after I finished these tests,
I looked back at my archived photos taken with an iPhone X.
Those pictures, especially the ones shot with portrait mode, still
looked impressive. Some of the low-light ones looked crummy in
comparison with the ones taken by the iPhone 11s, but I wouldn’t
recommend that you buy a new phone just to get better night
photos. You could always just use flash.
“You shouldn’t feel the need to buy a new iPhone every year” is a fine sentiment, one that many, if not most, reviewers make each year. Arguing, repeatedly, that your readers should not be concerned at all about taking better photos in low light is bizarre. The single biggest change in consumer photography over the last 3–4 years is the exponential improvement in low light and night mode photography on new mobile phones.